Download phpNuke v7.6,

Read on for the Change Log. Read More...

Note: 

Already there appears to be security issues and more with 7.6. Download and use at your own risk. See this thread for more information.

Announcement from phpnuke.org.

Hi Nukers! After a hard work that I describe as detective job, PHP-Nuke 7.6 has been released and the version 7.5 is available for free in the downloads section as usual. As you see, there isn't any change in the distribution model of the software, it remains as it's now. Ok, this new version has a detective's job on it because now you can rename the file admin.php to improve security, obviously this change required lot of files modifications... all call to admin.php which are tons! but it's done thanks to many suggestions. Read More...

Note: 

It is now in the downloads.

dmolavi writes:  

After a request for an RSS feed that admins could use to see any pending news submissions on their phpNuke site, I have created one. This thread (http://www.nukedgallery.net/postt1253.html#6965) contains the relevant code, and a link to the RSS generating php file for use on your site. Enjoy :)

beetraham writes:  

Ever had any obstacles on "Signature's Utilization" on Global Forums? Me too - however, there's a chance that things will get slightly eased up in the near future.

This QuadPackage provides (2x4) controllability options to carry out the use of Dynamic Statistics Signature [DSS]. Main application targets are herein; (1) DSS for pure PHP-Nuke and (2) DSS for "PHP-Nuke + Add-On Module (*vWar*)". The technical mainframe approaches are;

* "PHP + PNG" remoting" == the signature is generated *on-the-fly* by a DSS PHP Driver remote access
* "PNG remoting ONLY" == the signature is generated by Home Site initialized DSS PHP Driver access

Additionally, a DSS Drivers' built-in MySQL Query mechanism will take care of updating the *Total Impression Counts* regarding counted accesses on DSS PHP Drivers (signature impressions). This information is pulled along into the DSS generation scene, in an attempt to maximize the presence of binary chills for the proud owner of a DSS.

* ONLINE TEST ENVIRONMENT + INTRODUCTION/README (latter one accessible via first mentioned)
* DOWNLOADS
 Read More...

dmolavi writes:  

Mozilla Firefox has the ability to automatically bookmark RSS Feeds such as those generated by the backend.php file in phpNuke. So, why not use it to your advantage and let your users get a live feed of news from your site via Firefox? Read this post on how to do it.

I recieved a link today that shows that the FSF has stated that FB is violating the GNU/GPL and that he is mis reading it. Please goto PHP-Nuke DE. Please bear in mind part of the article is in german but the email from the FSF is in english. There are a couple more links, also from the German Nuke Community, that I felt that I should list here. PHP-Nuke-Community DE and Nuke_Creative DE. I want to thank everyone that has spoken their mind on these issues. It does my heart great good to see the outpouring by OUR community. In case you missed the replies to the article at PHP-Nuke you may see them Here.

Admin: I am reproducing the meat of the article here so that you don't have to follow the main link if you are too tired :lol:

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 05:22, Jens via RT wrote:
> Hello,
>I am a little bit confused: There exists a GPL Software named PHP-Nuke, based on the GPL Software "Thatware". This GPL Software includes a copyright disclaimer, which is shown on each generated page in the footer. Now, the author of php-nuke says:
>1) that nobody is allowed to remove this (c)
>2) if someone wnats to remove it, he has to pay 300 US$ as licensing-fee, named "Commercial Licence" (as to see here:http://www.phpnuke.org/modules.php?name=Commercial_License)
Now, please answer me:
>(1) Because of the GPL, am i not allowed to comment the (c) Line out? So the Line stays in the code? GPL tells me, that i can change the code as i want - so if i comment the line out, it still exists in the code, but there is no output.

FSF: The copyright notice in PHPNuke is not a (2)(c) notice. So, you need not retain it on the program's output.

>(2) Isn't it a GPL violation to offer this Licence? I just can't believe that this is OK - of course, the Author could offer two versions of his own source code: a gpl version and a "to-pay" version, but in fact, he distributes an "GPL version with enhanced Licence-Options". It is onw Software-Product, under one Licence, and please do not forget: It is based on the work of another gpl project "thatware". Is this ok?

FSF: I had never heard that PHPNuke was based on other GPL software. Are you sure that's the case?

FSF: It looks like the PHPNuke author is misinterpreting the GPL. This can probably be cleared up with a simple e-mail. The copyright holders of Thatware should write to the author of PHPNuke. Please let the copyright holders of Thatware know about the issue, and that we're glad to provide advice on this.

--
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF

Note: 

WEBMASTERS: Please copy this article to your news section if you would like to.