Author |
Message |
webservant
Worker


Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Posts: 206
Location: Springfield, MA
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:10 am |
|
I've been pondering whether or not to put a NukeSentinel(tm) block on my site for some time, and admit being at an impass. Does having a block deter someone from hacking (or attempting to hack) my site? Or does it just challenge / encourage them?
I'm curious to hear your opinions, and war stories... |
_________________ Awaiting His Shout
Webservant - GraciousCall.org
Romans 8:28-39 |
|
|
 |
hitwalker
Sells PC To Pay For Divorce

Joined:
Posts: 5661
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 6:27 am |
|
thats just personal.....
it can go both ways.....or they get scared,or they go for the challenge..
many dont use the block,and some do.... |
|
|
|
 |
Susann
Moderator

Joined: Dec 19, 2004
Posts: 3191
Location: Germany:Moderator German NukeSentinel Support
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:26 am |
|
I personally believe its greenly to believe that you can deter someone from hacking by using a public NukeSentinel block or a footer message like " protected by NukeSentinel" but who knows... |
|
|
|
 |
Tao_Man
Involved


Joined: Jul 15, 2004
Posts: 252
Location: OKC, OK
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:17 am |
|
I dont think in the long run it makes any diffrence, I think 99.9999999% of hackers never even look at or search your site, they just try and hack. I get hack attempts all the time for software that I never have had installed like Mambo or Coppermine. If they had checked out my site they would know I didn't have those. |
_________________ ------------------------------------------
To strive, to seek, to find, but not to yield!
I don't know Kara-te but I do know cra-zy, and I WILL use it! |
|
|
 |
jakec
Site Admin

Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: 3048
Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:19 pm |
|
From a hackers perspective you could argue that it tells them whether your site is up to date with the current Sentinel installation and help them work out what Hack to use. |
|
|
|
 |
hitwalker

|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 1:40 pm |
|
nice one.....jakec ,
but why should it be their concern...
most hackers are in it for the fun...showing off what they did...
kinda like macho's do......hey look i have a bigger .........ehm..car. |
|
|
|
 |
webservant

|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:07 pm |
|
Quote: | From a hackers perspective you could argue that it tells them whether your site is up to date with the current Sentinel installation and help them work out what Hack to use. |
This is exactly my line of reasoning that argues against the block. Why should I tell them what I'm running to make it easier. |
|
|
|
 |
jakec

|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:00 pm |
|
Quote: | nice one.....jakec |
Sorry Hitwalker, not quite sure how to take that, was that sarcasm?
Anyway, all the hacker has to do is search for 'sentinel 2.4.2' in google and you will find a load of sites which are still using version 2.4.2 and therefore vulnerable to certain attacks.
Perhaps we should consider removing the version number from the Sentinel blocks? |
|
|
|
 |
hitwalker

|
Posted:
Wed Nov 15, 2006 4:24 pm |
|
non of that...
i did realy mean ......."nice one jakec"
but i was just saying that any of it shouldnt concern the hackers.... |
|
|
|
 |
jakec

|
Posted:
Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:28 am |
|
OK cool
but do you not think having the version number on the block is advertising your site to hackers, especially if the version is out of date? |
|
|
|
 |
montego
Site Admin

Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: 9457
Location: Arizona
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:52 am |
|
Personally, I agree. We should never show version numbers. |
_________________ Only registered users can see links on this board! Get registered or login!
Only registered users can see links on this board! Get registered or login! |
|
|
 |
webservant

|
Posted:
Thu Nov 16, 2006 5:55 am |
|
I agree. Security by obscurity is not good security, but is does add to good security.  |
|
|
|
 |
hitwalker

|
Posted:
Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:28 am |
|
why help hackers...
a simple footer text like ....protected by sentinel... seems sufficiant enough..
in that way all they can wonder is,.....is it or is it not updated.... |
|
|
|
 |
|